• auth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is he also going to stop shipping weapons to Israel? Otherwise it makes no fucking sense.

    • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s actually a brilliant economic play. Instead of only arming Isreal, we should just arm both sides and get that CASH.

      • auth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think they are giving/selling weapons to Gaza Strip…

        • Doods@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Pushing some agenda is the only benefit it could get is getting by supporting either side, they’re both unprofitable; one’s poor and the other only accepts weapon donations.

          Edit: Getting oil from naval wells also makes some sense as an explanation.

    • yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      My first thought also. Developing the infrastructure to exploit natural resources under the cover of providing humanitarian aid, while simultaneously supplying the weapons that create the need for humanitarian aid.

      • Doods@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not like that happened in every* other Arab nation.

        *: You could argue some aren’t. For most of them natural resources were exploited using the corrupted puppets making all of the Arab nations’ governments.

    • Doods@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      But that would solve the problem as it’s the only real solution, they would never do that.