• SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s open source nature protects against that. People mistake Linus as being in the same boat as Stallman but Linus was only open source by circumstance, he kind infamously doesn’t seem to appreciate the role open source played in his own success.

    It already directly addresses the mistakes of x86 and ARM. I don’t know what he is so worried about.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Protects against what?

      What I read here is just a vague critic from him of the relation between hard- and software developer. Which will not change just because the ISA is open source. It will take some iterations until this is figured out, this is inevevable.

      Soft- and hardware developers are experts in their individual fields, there are not many with enough know-how of both fields to be effective.

      Linus also points out, that because of ARM before, RISC-V might have a easier time, on the software side, but mistakes will still happen.

      IMO, this article doesn’t go into enough depths of the RISC-V specific issues, that it warrants RISC-V in the title, it would apply to any up and coming new ISA.