• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re agreeing with me.

    You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

    So why do you think I’m arguing with you?

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t.

      You’re agreeing with me that biden is a good president, but incorrect that he’s only a good precedent relative to Trump.

      You’re very confused. Do you have any questions?

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        …but you said they’re arguing with you, which is why they asked why you think they’re arguing with you.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          What I said is:

          “what do you think you’re arguing about?”

          I didn’t mention myself.

          It’s clear they meant to be arguing something, but if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

          If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

          So, what do they think they’re arguing against?

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s clear they meant to be arguing something

            Right…

            if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

            Keep going…

            If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

            Almost there…