• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Microsoft’s refund policy is top notch too and I see proton as leveraging open source to avoid dev costs.

    More importantly, everything steam does could be done with 5% instead of 30% and Gaben would still be filthy rich.

    Steam is as greedy as the other platforms and it’s us, the consumers, and the indie scene that suffer for it. Are you okay with your favorite indie studio closing and your favorite game not getting a sequel because Gaben wants 8000 million a year instead of 1000 million a year?

    There is most likely collusion and soft monopolies, these platforms are clearly not competing in good faith.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      proton as leveraging open source to avoid dev costs

      As a developer, I have no problem with this. Why do work that doesn’t need to be done?

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t either, that is what open source is for afterall. I’m trying to point out that this decision wasn’t out of love for his customers but out of love for his bottom line. This let him compete with platforms with devices while having a seriously low entry cost compared to them. It’s just a smart business decision but people treat it as if it was charity.