• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    Strange that the article doesn’t mention that, since Biden claimed executive privilege, Garland can’t turn the audio over.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Well, they seem focused on the absurdity of this whole thing. And of course, it’s a Florida-woman trying to out batshit crazy everyone else.

      I just read a little bit about her and she’s basically a female George Santos. i.e lied about almost every aspect of her life to become a representative.

      Gross.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I remember hearing once that even if this were to happen, Congress can’t hold him longer than the end of this Congressional term.

    More political grandstanding from the party that is bereft of any ideals beyond give the rich more money and worship Trump.

  • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    So Congress has one man, with a particular set of skills, tasked with apprehending targets and bringing them to the House floor.

    Sounds like a movie idea.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wonder if Garland regrets waiting two years before prosecuting the top Republican insurrectionist. He’ll never stop being a conservative, but maybe he’ll stop being a Republican.