• Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Previous connectors had inherent flaws. The USB-C connector is sturdy, is easy to use etc. But even if we had made the micro-usb connector the only legal connector, it wouldn’t have been the end of the world. Existing standards can be improved instead of making new shapes each time.

      • baatliwala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        USB-C is a bitch to clean, I have had multiple devices where fast charging stopped working until I cleaned out the port or held the wire in a particular angle.

        • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yea that’s a valid concern. But if a new standard ever get’s invented that is clearly better the law can easily be switched. And if it doesn’t… USB-C is still more than fine.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      A and B are the original, used for host and device sides, respectively. C is the same on both ends of the cable because figures there’s device classes which can sensibly act as both, in particular phones. It’s also the most modern of the bunch supporting higher data transfer and power delivery rates because back in the days where A and B where designed people were thinking about connecting mice and keyboards, not 8k monitors or kWhs worth of lithium batteries.

      The whole mini/micro shennanigans are alternative B types and quite deeply flawed, mechanically speaking.