• rodneylives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember, Nate Silver predicted that Hillary Clinton would win in 2016, and when Trump won instead, it was chalked up to the fact that it really was a random chance.

    Don’t panic about this. Keep quiet and keep doing the work to get Trump thrown out. And charge your mental health bills to the Democrats, for putting up an old man up for election in 2020, one who’s even older than Trump, in the first place.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Iirc, didn’t he give Trump a much higher chance of winning than other outlets, even though it was still a small chance compared to Hillary?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah well there was also that nice October surprise. Prediction models don’t work well with stuff like that.

      • rodneylives@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And yet, that is what those models claim to do. If the possibility of late-breaking events is not included in the model then the model is flawed.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then nothing matters because the bombshell pictures proving child sexual assault could always drop. An October surprise is called that for a reason. It’s something out of left field that could not have been predicted, prepared for, or recovered from. To say prediction models must allow for that means you never get anything other than a 50/50 prediction and everything is useless. We should all just stay home and let life come at us. After all, we could get hit by a toilet from space at any moment.