• Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    On the other hand, belief in a widespread historical myth that has been argued by professional historians isn’t exactly ‘soveriegn citizen’ level - even if that myth has been overwhelmingly dismissed by the majority of their colleagues.

    Its pretty easy to hear a credible-sounding claim and take it in, without doing the research to debunk it

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not sure why you think sovereign citizen beliefs aren’t widespread. This community shows a ton of people seem to believe it. In multiple countries.

      Its pretty easy to hear a credible-sounding claim and take it in, without doing the research to debunk it

      Yes, that is exactly what sovcits do.

      • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Its pretty easy to hear a credible-sounding claim and take it in, without doing the research to debunk it

        Yes, that is exactly what sovcits do.

        I suppose where we differ then is if sovcit beliefs are ‘credible-sounding’

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          They are equally credible-sounding because they tell the person what they want to hear. SovCits are told they can get out of debt or a government fine. People who believe this are told that Muslims did something first due to their superior skills. It’s the same.

          • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah i suppose you have a point. I never think of sovcit claims as credible, but if that’s what someone needs to hear or believe in a tough time, could be a different story