• rcbrk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Huh. Even Boeing doesn’t want to be associated with Boeing:

    Boeing executives have repeatedly sought to make clear that the Starliner program operates independently from the company’s other units — including the commercial aircraft division that has been at the center of scandals for years.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The classic rebranding ala facebook -> meta / insta, or food companies with their thousands of differently named subsidiaries.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      After a half decade of delays and several major issues, including it spinning out of control in space on it’s first test flight, and all the issues with literally anything else Boeing touches, I can’t see how they talked them into getting in it in the first place.
      I’m pretty sure it hasn’t had a single fully successfully test flight yet so I’m surprised even NASA allowed it.

  • froh42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Where’s the problem? If the door opens blows out en route the astronauts will probably still reentry.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      …some of you are going to die…
      …martyrs, of course, to the freedom that I shall provide.

  • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thanks, Obama. Really glad you privatized space travel. It’s going great. Our space program now consists of Guy who wants space apartheid, and company whose name is synonymous with planes that crash for no reason.