• barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I really wish the government would do their goddamn jobs regarding monopolies. Instead they are just accepting bribes and facilitating the mergers.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Build it, don’t turn it on, watch all the residents complain about new ailments and conditions caused by the 5G.

    Reveal that it’s never even been powered to really hammer home their ignorant bullshit.

    The cognitively impaired should not be able to do this sort of shit.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The planning board’s decision was based on health concerns due to the possible negative environmental impact of telecommunication on the residents, especially the children studying at the school who could potentially be exposed to electromagnetic radiation.

    Because that surely would be the only cell tower in town.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is hilarious, a win-win in my book. I get to laugh at the ridiculous claim about radio waves frying people’s brains or whatever, and at the same time, every day of stalling hurts an exploitive POS telecom company.

    I’m rooting for the loonies! Protect our kids! You show those lizard people!

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    How does anyone become sensitive to a 5g wireless signal? I could see maybe z pscemaker or some kind brain stimulator device but just a bare bones corpus delecti would seem to be known early enough to decide not to live near the broadcaster

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not enough attention as a child, wants to get on TV, cant accept that their shit diet and aging means they dont feel like a 21 year old anymore.

      Maybe all three.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The planning board’s decision was based on health concerns due to the possible negative environmental impact of telecommunication on the residents, especially the children studying at the school who could potentially be exposed to electromagnetic radiation. The town felt the residents would be ‘unsafe’ due to radio frequencies and rejected the company’s notion of building the tower on the land.

    I mean, I think that the planning board is idiotic, but I don’t see why T-Mobile cares enough to fight it. If they don’t build it, okay. It looks like the school in question is right in the middle of town. Then Wanaque is going to have crummy cell coverage. Let them have bad cell coverage and build a tower somewhere else. It’s not like this is the world’s only place that could use better cell coverage. The main people who benefit from the coverage are Wanaque residents. Sure, okay, there’s some secondary benefit to travelers, but if we get to the point that all the dead zones that travelers pass through out there are covered, then cell providers can go worry about places that are determined not to have have cell coverage.

    If I were cell companies, I’d just get together with the rest of the industry and start publishing a coverage score for cities for cell coverage. Put it online in some accessible database format, so that when places like city-data.com put up data on a city, they also show that the city has poor cell coverage and that would-be residents are aware of the fact.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A quick web search for third-party coverage information tells me that Wanaque has good coverage from Verizon and poor coverage from T-Mobile. It’s easy to guess why T-Mobile might be motivated to change that situation.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Speedtest.net bought a service that was doing this already sort of. I looked just now and I think it’s their “map” option on their mobile app. You need to switch between carriers to see coverage.

      The tech was based off of manual speed tests and a background app that would measure coverage from a phone for a small area, about the size of 3 square acres.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      start publishing a coverage score for cities for cell coverage

      Each of them has an internal one and since contractors bounce around it’s like a wiki but slower.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thank god I’m safe! And I will be dead and gone before it happens here. It’s going to be decades before 5G is implemented where I live. Hell, 4G is spotty and unreliable even yet today. Even 3G was terrible.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      My issue with Verizon 5g is that it is worse than their old Edge service.

      5g on my signal bar essentially means “doesn’t work.” It wasn’t an issue when I could turn off the 5g radio, but Samsung pushed an update that removed that option.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ok now everyone put your magnetized needles in the Styrofoam and then make them float in the water to reveal where magnetic north is!

    Ahh teacher… Magnetic north is dancing metal rock right now.