• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    People want phones that don’t cost $1000+, lack basic features and constantly prey on their personal data. That’s what they want. Some express that by saying they want “dumb phones”, but the first part is the larger driver here.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I want those things and I want a phone that’s easy to use, doesn’t constantly advertise to me, and is more of a helpful tool than a distraction.

      • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think that last bit is more of a ‘what you make of it’ situation, regardless of how smart or dumb a phone is.

        Unfortunately the manufacturers want the data and advertising revenue, and they’d only be persuaded to offer an alternative if they made the same amount of money.

        If each sale of a $900 smart phone gives them $100 of ad revenue over a couple years, I’d bet my bottom dollar they would charge $200 for the ‘dumb’ version.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think the distractions are partially a user issue and partially a company issue. Companies make their programs noisy with notifications by default that I only change it once I’ve found it annoying. They also make their program so bloated that they are slow to load and execute. By the time the app loads, I’ve lost my flow and now the tool is a nuisance. My mind is already cluttered. I don’t need tech to slow it down.

  • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I don’t want a dumb phone but I would 100% take a phone with a back that isn’t glass, high repairability, and full control over the OS. Make it THICC and put a big battery too.

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      So a fairphone? Though it doesn’t provide wireless charging I think.

  • PugEnjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mostly just want a phone that doesn’t want to sell me on new ways to use my phone that I don’t already do. I don’t want a phone that’s constantly trying to get me to use voice search, or try out some AI feature, or a search engine, etc. I have a newer Samsung tablet, and by default holding the power button turned on voice search instead of the power off menu? I fucking hate that shit, it was thankfully changeable but it was annoying that I had to change it back. I literally never use voice search. I fucking hate talking to computers, I’m not talking to a machine unless it’s actually capable of feeling offended if I don’t

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think people really want dumbphones, I think they just want apps that better support their self-control. Digital Wellbeing on Android is a start, but it’s way too easy to bypass.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Dumbphone maybe not. But a Linux phone that is fully functional and eschews the corporate app eco system? Yes please

    I admit I would miss tap to pay tho