Anarchy! cites United States commercial law codes

In their recent Presidential Immunity ruling there was a long response by Clarence Thomas that included a section questioning the legality of Jack Smith’s appointment. Which is the same reasoning Cannon gives in her ruling.

The dissenting opinion in their recent Chevron Deference ruling criticises Thomas and others for using this tactics repeatedly to overturn laws they don’t like. They write opinions about one thing but include a bunch of questions about something only tangentially related. Then they’ll suddenly take up a case that seems to centre exactly around that question they had. A case that was only filed after the initial ruling.

Cannon using Thomas’ words is no mistake. It’s the way these judges have been legislating from the bench.

It’s normal for people to change how they speak based on the audience they’re speaking to. Here’s an interesting video focusing on “gay voice” but notes it’s not just a thing gay men do. Everyone does it. The thing is, it’s consistent, not random. If the person at your work isn’t changing their voice based on who they’re talking to, but randomly, they’re just being weird.

I built this company with my own two hands. Just me, that computer, and an $8 million loan from my father

Get Hard

It’s always possible to convert binary (machine code) into assembly since they’re basically the same thing. Assembly is just human readable binary.

It’s not possible to generate high level source code from assembly the same way you can’t generate a recipe for a cake by analyzing the composition of the cake. It doesn’t matter how smart you are, the temperature the oven was set at and time the cake spent in the oven can’t be found in the molecular structure of a cake.

This guy doesn’t want the government to be involved in his family life but also wants courts to recognize he is the legal father of the child?

A “Negotiable Instrument” is basically a cheque. It’s a peice of paper instructing a bank to pay a certain person a certain amount of money from a certain account at a certain date. It’s negotiable if the person who can get the money is transferrable. Ex. I write you a cheque for $50 and you sign it over to your friend. Your friend can now cash the cheque and my bank will pay your friend $50 from my account.

Here’s a sample bill I found online from an electrical company. The SovCiv is asking if the bottom part is actually a cheque they can cash. It’s just a peice of paper they can mail back to the company that contains all their account information in one spot to make processing payments easier for the company. It might also allow the person to pay their bill through their bank’s bill payment service. Essentially, the bank will use the details on that slip of paper to send money to the company directly from the person’s account.

Google continues the enshitification of the apps that made them such a dominant company.

I WAS IN THE POOL!

A 4 hour old account asking if spooning your sister is weird. This is a troll post.

>build pyramid for energy
>open it up
>dead bodies

I’ve been a vegetarian for 15 years. People IRL often do get offended if you tell them you don’t eat meat. I try my best to avoid saying it because it often leads to being lectured about proteins. Everyone suddenly becomes a nutritionist when you explain why you don’t eat meat.

I prefer the Carlin take: “They want live babies so they can turn them into dead soldiers”

China’s economy is stacked like a house of cards and could come crumbling down due to some unforeseen global financial shock, but then again that sounds like most modern economies. I think people just pick on China because, instead of having a group of billionaires stack up the cards, the government does it themselves.