don’t fight capitalist platforms with things they can match with money (advertising, cost, etc)

fight them with things they can’t control, like kind/intelligent communities

no i mean downscaling and quantising before taking the hash to be able to reliably get the same hash for images that have been compressed, downscaled, had individual pixels edited, etc

can’t you quantise and downscale the image, then take the hash?

cinny has nice ux imo

is noaa bad?

I like that Firefox exists and I use it and its forks but I really doubt that the aging gecko engine could be made competitive with chromium anytime soon enough to claw back market share to stop google doing shit like web environment integrity. Mozilla stopped work on Servo and they’re also kinda sus in terms of how they seem to be fine with receiving funding from google.

What you are really saying here is that you to some degree don’t disagree with Kling

ok lmao ctrl f my history for “they”

They implied you shouldn’t use the project based on the author’s opinions.

that’s what i said??

Boycotting the software doesn’t infringe on the author’s rights to have a shitty opinion.

how am i saying this? i’m saying that the guy is shortsighted for telling people to boycott the software just bc of the dev’s opinions

i’m not arguing about the arbitary rights of authors, i’m just saying that boycotting isn’t an efficient use of resources

have fun with google spyware ig when they finally do something like web environment integrity

isn’t that what they implied?

I’m fine with solumbran seeing the dev’s opinions as “wrong”, I just find how they base their whole view of the project on that single small disagreement makes them seem like a shortsighted dumbass

yeah but does that affect the browser development process significantly?

there are people with differing views in this world and you need to accept that if you want to actually achieve things

I’m not saying i agree with him bc I don’t, but I wouldn’t base my opinion on the project on the small grievance i have with one dev’s opinions.

people can have different views. you might not like them but it’s their views, not yours

you can’t convince companies that are profit driven. They follow whatever is the best decision for profit, which is clearly not letting you delete your account because they would’ve done that earlier if it led to profit. This assumes full efficiency on the side of the company but if they are large enough, that means that they are efficient enough to beat the competition already.

people on lemmy know but people on lemmy aren’t the general public