I agree.

Imagine a world where Chrome doesn’t exist and instead Firefox + privacy preserving attribution is the default for all of the people who won’t listen to your reasons why they shouldn’t use chrome or say “I don’t need privacy, I have nothing to hide”.

It seems like Mozilla is trying to do the browser equivalent of shifting the overton window and I’m for that.

However I’ll be monitoring them very very closely.

It wasn’t until he became president that everyone started losing their mind over it.

Do you not agree a position as powerful as President should be under more scrutiny?

Covid probably sped up his mental decline.

No. We just reject the losing DNC strategies that pushed for Hilary so hard and got trump elected.

The dissent is in bad faith and should be discarded.

Based upon what?

The bar for internet rando invalidating legal expert is pretty high BTW.

I’d need actual lawyers to make this make sense.

You mean like the dissenting judges?

But either way it didn’t seem as “carte Blanche presidents can do anything” to me when I read it.

Read the dissent. The most qualified people say it is literally carte blanche in the dissent.

No one is going to believe your arguments over the dissenting judges.

It is also very telling you’ve responded to no comments mentioning what the dissenting judges have said.

How do you square your take with the dissenting judges that say it effectively makes the president king?