The ruling is limited to “official acts”, but the same court is the one who decides if an act is official or not
The ruling is limited to “official acts”, but the same court is the one who decides if an act is official or not
thats_a_bold_move.gif
Trying to extort the federal government like that seems like a really quick way to end up with your face, phone number and home address in a press release, along with a note from the NSA that basically says “this guy has $33 million in Bitcoin, would be a shame if someone kicked in his door and beat him with a bat until he gave up the keys :)”
its more likely than you think
Being frustrated sure, but being angry at someone because they just don’t have a functional mental model of how the internet works is kinda pointless
Tangent, but I get irrationally angry when people do “go to site X and search for blah and it’s the 3rd result down” when trying to convey the location of some information on the internet rather than just sharing the goddam URL.
Why couldn’t they? The supreme court is literally the final authority, and there is no mechanism to automatically remove a justice from the bench. There is an ethics code that says they should recuse themselves if they have a conflict in a case but it has no enforcement mechanism - two sitting justices have literally taken bribes in violation of the ethics code