if there was evidence, it wouldn’t be a theory, would it?
that’s not how evidence works
what’s disappointing are the right wing autists who don’t understand English, like you.
Not sure why you think a rightist would be disappointed in the left acting afool. Try thinking critically next time. Nice ableism btw
I’m super disappointed in the dumb conspiracy theories being thrown around with no evidence among the left rn
Thanks for the evidence of the non-controversial, well established part of the comment
Yes, clearly i wanted evidence for the obvious fact and not the conspiracy theory
Evidence or stfu
and one of the world’s most scammer-friendly and least-anonymous
damages liability
it’s okay, reading is hard
It seems like the consensus is that the stories probably stem from a real guy because that’s deemed more likely than no person existing as a basis for the story, but no, there is not material evidence for jesus christ’s existence
Where did you find that his goal was to prove Jesus wasn’t who Christians claim to be? From what I’ve read about Lee Strobel, he was sort of an atheist by default and converted when his wife did. He became a pastor and only wrote the Case for Christ more than a decade later
Read the comment chain again. Use the context clues. I believe in you