“Election fraud” isn’t something they actually believe; they know the election wasn’t stolen. “Election fraud” is a hurdle or stumbling block meant to trap Democrats into trying to reason with someone who isn’t being reasonable. It’s an opportunity to troll people. But most importantly, it’s an empty set of words used as a shield behind which they can commit actual election fraud.

This line of thinking makes me realize that a really good tool for dialogue with these fence-sitters, if we may call them that, would be to reasonably ask them “how has this belief worked out for you?”, in response to some usual garbage conspiracy theory projection.

Do they know how to properly pluralize proper nouns?

Aye yes, a man of class and of culture

100 snakes in trousers

Are there 100 single-legged trousers, or 50 trousers with 2 snakes in each leg trouser?

It’s a color pattern, what more does he need to know? This one is reaching hard with the gatekeeping.

edit: not knocking the iconic 90’s pattern, I actually dig the guy’s look despite his young age and perceived lack of exposure to the design