• JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    The fact apple gets to decide which app stores are allowed and which aren’t kind of defeats the point of this decentralisation attempt

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think you read it wrong then. It just says that Apple has accepted it, not that they decide.

      It is EU who makes the rules. This just implies that Apple is on board or have been forced to do so.

      If Apple had denied, it would break the rules laid upon them.

      • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact apple has the option to accept or deny a third party store means they get to decide what third party stores are allowed on their device. The spirit of the law that the EU punished them for would say that apple should not have any say in what the users install on their devices, similar to how Aptoide, f-droid, and other third party app stores exist on android without requiring Google’s approval. Apple is just doing all they can to comply to the smallest legal degree they can to make as much money as possible from the waiting period between EU wristslaps.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          All iOS apps on the app store need app approval. It’s the same for Googles app store, and I bet Samsungs and Amazon’s as well.

          They test your app and make sure it functions and meets some basic guidelines.

          The EU isn’t giving 3rd party stores carte blanche to break the rules, so yes apple has to approve it.

          I imagine there’s probably some extra rules just for app stores, but if that’s the case (I don’t know) they’d need to be reasonable or they’d get in trouble.

          I am curious though if apple can enforce rules on what apps go on the 3rd party store.

          Edit: lots of edits for clarity, but also, apple appears to be being a dick in the process of approving this and abusing their position.

          • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s just an excuse imo, it’s the exact thing apple is known for, using fine print to be an asshole

      • kevindqc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Well they had denied, because the placement of the Install button was too similar to where it is in their own store 🙄, and changed course to temporarily approve it.

  • paf0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Only a matter of time before they move the goal posts again to protect their monopoly. Tim Cook is a bully.

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s why the EU election is the most important election for the world, because no one else is doing anything.