• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Except we have 2 parties still. How did voting third party in the past solve that problem? Proof is in the pudding.

    • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      When one of the two major parties becomes tired of losing elections, they adopt policies from a third party to attract their voters.

      The impact of third parties on American politics extends far beyond their capacity to attract votes. Minor parties, historically, have been a source of important policy innovations. Women’s suffrage, the graduated income tax, and the direct election of senators, to name a few, were all issues that third parties espoused first.

      • Rosenstone, Behr and Lazarus
      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So, it didn’t solve the problem? I’m not sure what you’re driving at here. I’m not saying there shouldn’t be multiple parties, I’m saying the vote during our presidential election, under our current system, is a strategic one, not one to throw away on a third party.

        • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s solved many problems.

          The point that the American historians quoted above are making is that if you enjoy certain policies, like being able to vote for senators, women’s rights, or progressive taxation, thank a third party voter.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Your quote talks about how third parties brought about some changes. At no point did I say third parties have no place in us politics, nor did I say never vote for third parties.

            • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              At no point did I say third parties have no place in us politics, nor did I say never vote for third parties.

              Not voting or voting third party for POTUS does nothing. It’s just pure vanity.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                So, you don’t understand that the POTUS election is not the entirety of the us political system? I’m not sure what I’m supposed to say here, you quoted two very obviously different things.

                • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The examples I gave, 17th amendment, women’s suffrage, progressive taxation, were pushed by third party POTUS candidates.

                  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    None of what you provided says anything about presidential elections.