TL;DR: People be dumb.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The real problem is in our technologically advanced and prosperous civilization, we no longer have true survival of the fittest to weed out the morons.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    We really need to stop calling it a theory, because the lowest common denominator has no clue what it actually means.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      I understand why you’re saying that, but I would say that scientific terms shouldn’t be changed just to appeal to the lowest common denominator. That isn’t science, that’s PR.

      Now we do have a lack of good science communicators. A lot of people don’t like Neil DeGrasse-Tyson, although there seems to be less hate for Bill Nye. We sure could use a guy like Carl Sagan these days though. I think what Sagan really understood and was able to do in a way that people who came after him just couldn’t replicate was getting people to understand science through the wonder of it all. To show them that the real universe is a far more interesting place than anything they might read in any book of fiction from thousands of years ago.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The article that was posted earlier today about how oil and gas firms are twisting scientists words to make “uncertainty” (which is a confidence interval, not “we’re not sure”) I’m pretty sure we need to stop using certain words. At this point, PR is a major part of scientists jobs. Just like managing communications is a major part of programmers jobs, even though there’s a huge belief that programmers can’t talk to others. I won’t hire someone who can’t work with nor communicate with others. The same should apply to scientists.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        A lot of people don’t like Neil DeGrasse-Tyson, although there seems to be less hate for Bill Nye.

        I wonder white the difference could be?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m sure that’s it for some people and I personally like him, but he does have a bit of an ego on him and I think that turns people off.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is Bill Nye’s ego not at least as large, though?

            (I feel like I should point out that I don’t think either of them are wrong for having a bit of an ego. It’s really hard to be right all the time and surrounded by a sea of idiots without turning into an exasperated jerk – frankly, I think they should both be commended for resisting assholery as well as they do.)

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I honestly barely pay attention to BIll Nye because I used to watch him on Almost Live, so it’s basically impossible for me to take him seriously, so you’re asking the wrong person.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Admittedly, I never watched Bill Nye Saves the World, so I don’t know firsthand how egotistical (or otherwise) he was. But still, that title alone says something…

                I did watch the obscure Planet Green show Living with Ed, however, in which Bill Nye was portrayed as the rival/antagonist and kind of an asshole. Who knows how much that was being played up for the camera, though.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Bill’s TV career started in sketch comedy (hence me being unable to take him seriously), so I wouldn’t be shocked if it was played up for the cameras.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I probably would as well, but Sagan didn’t and that’s a skill that’s very hard to master. Unfortunately, that’s also a very necessary skill when trying to communicate science with people ready to attack you.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa

    hol’ up

    We’re saying there were Roswell survivors now? Last I heard we just did an autopsy that was supposed to be kept under wraps.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is the image not loading for anyone else? If not, here’s the direct link: https://removed/FwFR9zv/8uujch.jpg

  • UmeU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    At first I think, this is a bunch of trolls trolling off all over each other, nobody can be this delusional. Then I realize, this sounds like some of my relatives.