• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    Frankly I’m surprised its without permission. Throw that shit in the ToS right next to the part about Google having permission to kiss my mom whenever they want - nobody’s going to read it and the TOS for Google drive already allow them to look at user content.

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course. There’s a reason Gmail has always been free, and it’s not out of the goodness of their hearts.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    This makes a lot of sense. The fuel for AI is data and there is sooo much non public data.

    Google is behind but they have loads of user data, the temptation would be too great for a company that no longer had a “don’t be evil” value.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    This includes paying users? I wonder how that works for doctors offices that have paid subscriptions and maybe store sensitive data on those servers? That would be a stupid idea, of course, but still, a lot of smaller practices don’t really have a good it guy that can help them do things right

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    They should blame the AI, saying it’s going rogue, but without citizenship we can’t prosecute the AI, so we should give them citizenship, and then suddenly we are equals, lol!