• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Turing Test (as some people believe it to be): if you can have a conversation with a computer and not tell if it’s a computer, then it must be intelligent.

      AI companies: writes ML model that is specifically designed to convincingly play one side of a conversation, even though it has no ability to understand the things it talks about.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s worth emphasizing that the “Turing Test” is not a good test since it’s not at all scientific.

        It’s just another thought experiment that grifters have taken to the bank.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also as Turing proposed it it’s meant to be infinitely repeatable. The test isn’t supposed to just be if a machine can convince one person with one conversation. That would be trivial. The real Turing test is the converse, it says that there should be no conversation one could have with the machine where it wouldn’t convince you it’s a human.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Much like IQ tests for humans are flawed too. Figuring out series of numbers or relations in a graphic representation, only tells how good you are at these specific tasks, and doesn’t provide a reliable picture of “general” intelligence.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    “close to meaningless” sums up my expert opinion on the whole current AI hype machine sales pitch.

    Highly tuned models for incredibly specific, not-dangerous use cases is the next pragmatic step. There’s a lot to excited about, in that very narrow band.

    Anyone selling more than that is part of a con, or in very rare cases, doing genuine “fuck off and ask me again in a decade” kinds of research.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Looks quite satisfying to me, otherwise, we can still create new tests … :

    The tests cover an astounding range of knowledge, such as eighth-grade math, world history, and pop culture. Many are multiple choice, others take free-form answers. Some purport to measure knowledge of advanced fields like law, medicine and science. Others are more abstract, asking AI systems to choose the next logical step in a sequence of events, or to review “moral scenarios” and decide what actions would be considered acceptable behavior in society today.