• gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    trustworthy AI

    Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral

    What

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    people please actually read the article not the headline; this is literally about accessibility improvements for blind and visually impaired people for generating alt text inside of documents and pdfs.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s one of the things, but it’s also adding a dedicated sidebar for AI. That’s the sort of thing that should just be an extension, there’s absolutely no reason at all why that needs to be something built into the browser.

      Developers should be providing alt text themselves, but in cases where they aren’t having a local image recognition model running to provide a description isn’t terrible as long as it’s either 100% local or completely opt-in.

      The dedicated sidebar on the other hand feels very much like a cheap attempt to cash in on the AI fad.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s the sort of thing that should just be an extension

        It most likely is on the technical level, just shipped by default and integrated into standard settings instead of the add-on ones. And it’s going to be opt-in, so you won’t have to go into about:config to disable it. Speaking of: You’re looking for extensions.pocket.enabled, it should be false. And before you say “muh diskspace” it’s probably like 5k of js and css or such.

    • proti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      yeah but AI bad no matter if it would be actually useful for once

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      access their preferred AI service from the Firefox sidebar to summarize information, simplify language, or test their knowledge, all without leaving their current web page.

      Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Now we just need accessibility tools for the cognitively impaired that can’t seem to read the damn article.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Many of the people complaining about a feature they would just disable and never use are also the same kinds of people who would complain about basic accessibility features and call them “unnecessary bloat”.

  • maxinstuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why does my open source browser need proprietary SaaS products stuffed into it?

    Isn’t this what extensions are for?

    • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It also has google stuffed into it, and apparently the new consensus is that you need AI just as much for browsing as a search engine

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Firefox has a tendency to embed optional extensions as impossible to uninstall core features these days, so it would not change much.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wish they spent their time fixing bugs, rather than implementing this bullshit

    • Openopenopenopen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Can I ask areal question? I’m not trying to be a dick or smart ass, I legit don’t get this. What is bullshit here? I read the article and it seems like a useful feature to me.

      “this week, we will launch an opt-in experiment”

      “those who have opted-in will have the option to access their preferred AI service from the Firefox sidebar”

      Is this opt in only feature really terrible? Because as a user of ai, not switching tabs sounds like a nice new feature to me.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I strongly believe that generative AI is catastrophically misused in the vast majority of its applications, so in my eyes, adding gpt-based AI to the browser is largely a wasted effort

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I highly doubt they have one team that switches between experiments and bug fixes, never doing two things at once. Not to mention that something ultimately being ripped out isn’t necessarily wasted effort. They could likely easily pivot virtually anything they put into this specific experiment into any number of other uses.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Honestly, the worst part of the AI craze is that so many people hear AI now and immediately hate it even though it can really do some amazing stuff, e.g. in medicine. AI as a blanket term just has so much variance, there’s a ton of trash and a ton of great stuff.

    • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      “AI” today mostly refers to LLMs, and whichever LLM you’re using, you’ll likely face the same issues (wrong answers creeping in, tending towards mediocrity in its answers, etc.) - those seem to be things you have to live with if you want to use LLMs. if you know you can’t deal with it, another rebrand won’t help anything

    • firepenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Part of the problem is that all ads anymore want push their version of “AI” in your face and some of these “AI” are nothing new just rebranded.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Part of my research as an undergrad was working with PLSA. It’s very much an algorithm.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral, but we will continue adding AI services that meet our standards for quality and user experience.

    Is that the same Mozilla that started the Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness?

    What in living hell do proprietary and predatory AI services even doing here?

    Mozilla just offered users to feed into the very abomination they claim to fight.

    Also, for all things “AI”, local is the only way to go if you ever want to have a chance at privacy.

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    The new CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers, has a background working at all sorts of evil companies like AirBnB and PayPal. Its absolutely no surprise that the company immediately dropped plans to diversify in ethical, unique and privacy friendly ways as soon as she joined.

    CEOs getting paid primarily in stock means grifters like this will drop their USP for whatever trend makes the line go up, if it is crypto, NFTs, or AI.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Pretty sure the only thing I wouldn’t object to AI being used for in Firefox would be ad blocking. Surely they’re going to use this for that right?

    Right?

    Shit.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why Mozilla? Why? You were the chosen one… Fuck it, I’m going back to lynx! Tabs? Sure we have tabs in lynx, just run lynx in tmux

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    The way I see AI being implemented into Firefox, regardless of whether it’s gonna be opt-in or out in the future is that they need to keep up with the latest browser trends in the future. If they don’t, they will definitely lose more of whatever probably small amount of remaining normies who don’t use edge or chrome but instead opt for Firefox. They’re not tech literate enough to see a conveniently placed ad telling them that xyz browser now uses AI security features and Firefox doesn’t and discern the fact that it’s a ploy to get them to switch. We need more normies if we really want a chance to keep Firefox more than just treadingn water, and the best way is to offer more random bullshit of the week to keep them from switching to a competitor.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Any good forks without AI? I really don’t want that AI companies with my data.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re not just giving these AI companies your data…

      It’s an optional feature, and you would choose which model you use. If you choose not to use it, or disable the feature, nobody will recieve your data. If you want a browser without these features, Librewolf will likely be a safe choice, as I don’t seem them adding this.

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Were in the code is this? When you use ChatGPT (example), the platform pulls in the data.

        Ill give Librewolf a try, thanks.

  • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Anyone have any other good suggestions for Firefox alternatives? Sounds like I may be needing to switch soon.