Elephant with some birds on it?
I think the spines are part of the background, a bush or a tree or something. Also saw an elephant. Elephant standing in front of a bush.
I was thinking pig
Who knows? Maybe just an imaginary creature with some fins on its back that happens to look like a dinosaur. The problem is that armchair archaeologists think “this looks like that” has significance when it usually doesn’t.
Hang on. Is he showing this is proof that ancient civilizations had shrinking rays and could turn tiny dinosaurs into rocks, and build them into arches?
I’ve heard stupider. Unfortunately.
Literally an elephant with a bush behind it
Looks like a boar to me.
^why hello there mr obelix i’m a big fan :)^
That’s clearly an early 2nd century depiction of Your Mum
The whole thing looks like AI to me. Something seems off in the coloration.
That is entirely possible. AI pictures have been fooling these nuts lately. Sometimes they even say they’re AI.
Right there in the lower left-hand corner.
To me it looks like this thing:
That was added in the 90s when the cathedral was undergoing renovation.
That’s clearly a moomin
Of course because there is no way the craftsman who made that couldn’t have used artistic license. Or for that matter never observed fossils.
We honestly have no way of knowing (unless this is some sort of common religious iconography, which it might be) what whoever carved it was thinking and why at this point. But I think ‘dinosaur’ is probably the worst answer.
My nephew has a bunch of depictions of dinosaurs in his room.
The only logical conclusion is that dinosaurs have roamed the earth within the last 6 years.
Above that is a tailless kangaroo.
And and below it is a Muppet mermaid.
Wait what does this prove?
Gullibility mostly.
Richie Cunningham never gets old.
Sit on it, Potsie! It’s a dinosaur if I say it’s a dinosaur!
You’re not FlyingSquid!
Oh, wait…
