jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoProgressive Dems Call for Codifying Chevron After 'Dangerous' Supreme Court Ruling | Common Dreamswww.commondreams.orgexternal-linkmessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1381arrow-down12
arrow-up1379arrow-down1external-linkProgressive Dems Call for Codifying Chevron After 'Dangerous' Supreme Court Ruling | Common Dreamswww.commondreams.orgjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoIdeological successors. Agree with your post. They’ve been coming for Chevron for at least 50 years, but they also fight regulation at every turn.
minus-squareCopernican@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoChevron is 40 years old. How can you come after it for at least 50 years?
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoBefore Chevron there was Skidmore Deference, and they came for that. Maybe I should have said they’ve been coming for all deference. Or ~50 years, for the pedants.
Ideological successors. Agree with your post.
They’ve been coming for Chevron for at least 50 years, but they also fight regulation at every turn.
Chevron is 40 years old. How can you come after it for at least 50 years?
Before Chevron there was Skidmore Deference, and they came for that.
Maybe I should have said they’ve been coming for all deference. Or ~50 years, for the pedants.