• Questy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    As a Canadian watching this, knowing that his loss would accelerate the shift to a dictatorship south of the border, it’s so disheartening. What is wrong with the Democrats, it’s bizarre. I can’t even imagine having to vote for a candidate like him, that it’s even a question when his opponent is such an absolute clown. It’s the dumbest timeline.

    This was interesting to listen to, the only thing left is single issue voting. A vote for whatever is put across from Trump, regardless of who or what it is, opens the chance for another election to try again.

    https://youtu.be/Ikm4kDl4A4A?si=B0cUpEZORixoluTY

    • PassingThrough@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      On the one hand, it’s a tradition at this point to always run the incumbent. In most cases, it’s a slam dunk win unless things went really wrong. (say a pandemic)

      The difference now is that I don’t think we’ve ever had presidents get this old. I think Reagan ended this old but no one has ever run for office this old. And I can’t blame a guy for getting old like I can blame a guy for spouting lies and vitriol. I do think it’s time for an upper age limit for office though. If people can be too young, they can be too old. And it seems like people are living long enough to get to test it.

      But on the other hand, there just aren’t any democrats that came close to winning the primary, wether because of the first hand tradition or because they just didn’t have anything good to bring to the table I’m not sure.

      And when the opposition is as sturdy as Trump, it’s not the time to play games with untested newbies, you know? So you try to bring up your battle hardened best, even if he might be getting up there in years.

      That said, before the debate, I felt like he had the ability. He’s been strong at previous public appearances. I truly hope this is a fluke, and he wipes the floor with Trump at the next debate. Because otherwise we are screwed, either because Biden fades out on us or Trump gets to try for his racist autocracy.

        • PassingThrough@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, given my work schedule it was late for me too. But it was an OK time for the other coast I suppose. Good thing I have a DVR.

          Old age aside, that’s the curse of campaigning while actively President I think. Biden’s been up since god knows when hearing reports, making tactical decisions, worrying about multiple wars, working the reporters, navigating security concerns and doing his job, while also having to rehearse what he can anticipate, get to the studio and get all made up and go on TV. I’d be fried at the tail end of such a day too.

          Trump probably threw a party, napped, popped some strong pills, printed another copy of his same old rally speech and came out of a hotel across the street ready to blame some immigrants for the sun going down.

          Maybe we should get the VP to run the country on important days like debates so the active president can get the same treatment as the guy with nothing better to do?

          • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Maybe we should switch to a single term limit… That way the president never has to be distracted by campaigning.

      • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        In most cases, it’s a slam dunk win unless things went really wrong. (say a pandemic)

        I think people are severely overestimating how much of an impact being an incumbent actually has with the final results. In smaller elections this definitely has a big impact, but in the entirety of the US history we’ve only had 27 presidents run for reelection, and 9 of them have lost.

        That’s a ~67% win rate for incumbent presidents, which isn’t terrible, but isn’t great either, and with a terrible sample size.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          67% is massive what are you talking about? When you were gearing up for it I thought you were going to give away lower number and then you said that holy crap. Now I’m even more convinced he should still run.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      What is wrong with the Democrats, it’s bizarre.

      The republican-adjacent wing of the party has the candidate they want, and they’re so unforgivably pigheaded that they would rather lose democracy forever than change.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ever read up on the elections in Germany that led to Hitler’s rise?

      The millionaires and billionaires that have paid for all these nominees think Trump will: 1. cut regulations for them, & 2. he’ll be easy to control.

      Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

      (I admit, there’s also a bit of 3. help get Israel to start WWIII so all them rich white folks can get raptured, which is one of the reasons Biden also is supporting Israel.)