• Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am voting for Biden and everyone else who doesn’t want fascism should too, but I am so fucking beaten down by the Democrats hand picking terrible candidates, and our court system is already so destroyed it may not matter if Biden even wins.

    • Questy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      As a Canadian watching this, knowing that his loss would accelerate the shift to a dictatorship south of the border, it’s so disheartening. What is wrong with the Democrats, it’s bizarre. I can’t even imagine having to vote for a candidate like him, that it’s even a question when his opponent is such an absolute clown. It’s the dumbest timeline.

      This was interesting to listen to, the only thing left is single issue voting. A vote for whatever is put across from Trump, regardless of who or what it is, opens the chance for another election to try again.

      https://youtu.be/Ikm4kDl4A4A?si=B0cUpEZORixoluTY

      • PassingThrough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        On the one hand, it’s a tradition at this point to always run the incumbent. In most cases, it’s a slam dunk win unless things went really wrong. (say a pandemic)

        The difference now is that I don’t think we’ve ever had presidents get this old. I think Reagan ended this old but no one has ever run for office this old. And I can’t blame a guy for getting old like I can blame a guy for spouting lies and vitriol. I do think it’s time for an upper age limit for office though. If people can be too young, they can be too old. And it seems like people are living long enough to get to test it.

        But on the other hand, there just aren’t any democrats that came close to winning the primary, wether because of the first hand tradition or because they just didn’t have anything good to bring to the table I’m not sure.

        And when the opposition is as sturdy as Trump, it’s not the time to play games with untested newbies, you know? So you try to bring up your battle hardened best, even if he might be getting up there in years.

        That said, before the debate, I felt like he had the ability. He’s been strong at previous public appearances. I truly hope this is a fluke, and he wipes the floor with Trump at the next debate. Because otherwise we are screwed, either because Biden fades out on us or Trump gets to try for his racist autocracy.

          • PassingThrough@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I mean, given my work schedule it was late for me too. But it was an OK time for the other coast I suppose. Good thing I have a DVR.

            Old age aside, that’s the curse of campaigning while actively President I think. Biden’s been up since god knows when hearing reports, making tactical decisions, worrying about multiple wars, working the reporters, navigating security concerns and doing his job, while also having to rehearse what he can anticipate, get to the studio and get all made up and go on TV. I’d be fried at the tail end of such a day too.

            Trump probably threw a party, napped, popped some strong pills, printed another copy of his same old rally speech and came out of a hotel across the street ready to blame some immigrants for the sun going down.

            Maybe we should get the VP to run the country on important days like debates so the active president can get the same treatment as the guy with nothing better to do?

            • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Maybe we should switch to a single term limit… That way the president never has to be distracted by campaigning.

        • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          In most cases, it’s a slam dunk win unless things went really wrong. (say a pandemic)

          I think people are severely overestimating how much of an impact being an incumbent actually has with the final results. In smaller elections this definitely has a big impact, but in the entirety of the US history we’ve only had 27 presidents run for reelection, and 9 of them have lost.

          That’s a ~67% win rate for incumbent presidents, which isn’t terrible, but isn’t great either, and with a terrible sample size.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            67% is massive what are you talking about? When you were gearing up for it I thought you were going to give away lower number and then you said that holy crap. Now I’m even more convinced he should still run.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        What is wrong with the Democrats, it’s bizarre.

        The republican-adjacent wing of the party has the candidate they want, and they’re so unforgivably pigheaded that they would rather lose democracy forever than change.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ever read up on the elections in Germany that led to Hitler’s rise?

        The millionaires and billionaires that have paid for all these nominees think Trump will: 1. cut regulations for them, & 2. he’ll be easy to control.

        Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

        (I admit, there’s also a bit of 3. help get Israel to start WWIII so all them rich white folks can get raptured, which is one of the reasons Biden also is supporting Israel.)

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean replacing his as the candidate this late and when he’s the incumbent president is honestly madness.

      The only reason the media is pushing for it is because it would generate more clicks. Bit him being replaces and the ensuing trump second term.

      • rsuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’d argue madness is sticking with a candidate who now has virtually zero chance of winning what should be an easy race with anyone else. Democrats have stuck their head in the sand way too many times. They did it with how unpopular Hillary was in 2016. They did it with RBG not retiring. And now They’re doing it again.

        This is the simple, undeniable truth: Biden is extremely unpopular. One could argue he might win, but that’s the best you can do. A remote, unlikely possibility that he could beat what should be the least electable person in history.

      • retrospectology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think so honestly. Biden is deeply unpopular, I think that if he were to step down soon the DNC could pretty much offer up anyone who’s not Hillary Clinton and have just as good a chance of winning if not better (depending on their choice of candidate). The people who “vote blue no matter who” are going to literally vote for any democrat who gets the nomination, so you can only gain potential voters by getting rid of Biden. There’s nothing to lose with him stepping down, the sliver of undecided voters just abandoned him after that debate and him giving the finger to the left and saying “We don’t need you.” has made him, specifically, really toxic this cycle.

        People are really underestimating how much contempt there is for Biden is at this moment, he’s polling even with Trump if you’re charitable. The genocide and his hawkish immigration policy has made it impossible for a lot of people to hold their nose this time.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah hubris probably isn’t the way to go when you’re losing in national polls 10 pts below where you were in 2020 at this time… And you’re losing in every battleground state… And you’re losing black and Hispanic voters… And the desperation play of asking for this debate to break the steady decline in polling utterly backfired.

      Riddle me this: what if Biden’s condition worsens from here until November and it’s far past the convention to do anything? He’s not getting younger. The bad days, the sundowning will only get worse.

      People are itching to vote for anyone but a senile geratric and a criminal geriatric. Give the people what they want.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would vote for a potato before trump. Any sane person would at this point.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Please stop using this argument. It’s a classic echo chamber claim. If it was true there wouldn’t be people complaining, much less voting for Trump.

      • retrospectology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yerp, it just reinforces him looking inflexible and old, committed more to some personal fantasy than what’s actually best for the country in reality.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Did you listen to what he said tho? When it was coherent it was a great platform policy wise.

          He’s old. We get it. No one cares…the policy is still better than trump

          • retrospectology@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            A politician claiming they support a policy means nothing in modern politics, it only matters what they actually deliver and fight for. Biden is too corporate to do anything but waste everyone’s time. He adopted progressive policy points in 2020 because he was up against Sanders but then more or less abandoned those policies after they either got shot down by his party or were employed as temporary emergency measures (ex. Child tax credit).

            Much of Biden’s left appearing policy is just a thin cover for pork barrel spending, and worse he will deliver these little bits here and there that provide nothing to build on and then pat himself on the back and sit back on his laurels like he did more than the barest of minimums.

            I’m just not impressed with his actual policy achievments or goals, when you strip away all the big rhetoric there really isn’t that much there. Biden’s not a fighter and he gives the impression he doesn’t believe in any of the stuff he tepidly pushes for, he just figures he can’t only give gandouts to corporations or it becomes to obvious what he’s there to do.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you elect Biden with high probability we end up with i.) he dies on the job, ii.) he steps down during his term or iii.) he is removed by his cabinet. Just completely ridiculous to nominate anyone over 75, let alone 81. Mandatory retirement exists for a reason.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well yeah… Him winning and then getting out of there would be ideal. Sadly, he is very unlikely to win at this point.

    • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      42% of Democrats in a post-debate Ipsos poll said that Biden is mentally fit.

      Did those 42% see the same debate that I did? I don’t understand it.

      The major parties are just cults at this point.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Same echo chamber that’s been rattling around Lemmy, accusing everyone who doesn’t worship Biden of being MAGA.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not even a Democrat and I think he is more fit. He can at least answer a question about childcare without being asked 3 times like a 4 year old who is in trouble.

        Why am I going to care for a candidate that doesn’t care enough about his country to answer the questions the people really want to know? For one that can’t accept that he is a felon? That cannot be a real man and own up to his actions?

        He’s soft. He’s stupid. And he ain’t worth my vote.

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Do the democrats actually have anyone worth putting up instead of Biden? Like what’s the alternatives?

    Surely they must have at least one young guy from Texas that wears a cowboy hat or something.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sure sure, there are dozens of options. That’s not the issue. IMO internal DNC power is what is at play. It doesn’t matter what Biden does because he’ll retire soon, but a young leader would take power away from corporate backers for decades to come.

      Also, to hell with the Times.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Any two party voting system is a terrible, terrible system. New Zealand changed theirs and it’s much better now (according to Kiwis I spoke to).

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      What exactly are you saying Daily Beast got wrong here? They said he wasn’t endorsed and won. Are you saying that isn’t true? Because you also seem to acknowledge that he won that race

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        He was not endorsed in the primary.

        He was endorsed in the general in 2020.

        Biden didn’t win be a lot by 2020. But he has a habit of telling anyone that doesn’t support him 100% that he doesn’t need them

        I thought it was a pretty obvious issue.

        Edit:

        I mean. He’s responding to criticism he might not be able to win the general, are you saying he was talking about the primary?

        Is this just him getting confused again?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            Can you provide a quote from the article

            So you want a quote from the article titled:

            Elect Joe Biden America

            That has a byline of the entire Times editorial board …

            To show they the Times endorsed Biden last election?

            Are you sure the headline isn’t enough?

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This has nothing to do with the general.

      The NYT is now calling for Democrats to nominate someone other than Biden.

      Biden is pointing out that the NYT did the same in 2020, but Democrats nominated Biden anyway. In other words, who cares what the NYT wants?

  • cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    According to Biden,

    • Trump is a once in a generation threat to democracy that must be defeated at any cost.
    • He, Biden, an 81 year old guy with even lower approval ratings than Trump, should be the guy who goes up against Trump. Nobody else on the D bench should be allowed to try.

    Great logic.

    Oh by the way, there are no signs that Sotomayor is planning to retire either…

      • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Half of that table has no fucking data, and you’re saying that Biden is better than the competition?!?

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Brand new data shows that no Democrat outperforms Biden against Trump.

          Also, when asked who should replace Biden the clear favorite was Kamala Harris. So be careful what you wish for.

          • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Harris performs the same as Biden in a head-to-head matchup against Trump.

            So we get the same performance without concern for age, etc. what’s to lose?

            Also, I didn’t see a MoE reported.

            I’m not a fan of Harris, but we need to keep trump out of the WH.

          • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I would have loved to see the results if they had included any progressive possibilities in there… especially Bernie.

            • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’ve got to stop kidding yourself, most of america does not.share your/our political opinions, it feels like it when inside a bubble like on here but the wider reality of people who actually vote they’re not going to win.

          • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            The incumbent just shit the bed on live tv and fell into the trap set by the degenerates. You can huff as much copium as you want, we’re fucked without a shakeup of some kind. Brandon has a chance, sure, especially if Trump chokes on a fucking hamberder, but that’s not a risk worth taking. Swapping him out for a charismatic leader is a risk worth taking. Now kindly fuck off.

          • horndogAI@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            The previous incumbent lost during a major crisis, which is supposed to be like the most sure-fire way for a president to get re-elected.

            I think the rulebook is taking a break at the moment.

      • cyd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Polling of hypotheticals is notoriously flaky. If a fresh D comes in as nominee, all the “have to beat Trump” talking points will still be there, and all the “this guy has dementia” talking points will be wiped away. It’s hard to imagine any other nominee having negatives that could be worse than credible accusations of dementia.

        Edit: except for Harris.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Why would it?

          If anything, the opposite would occur. As soon as someone announces they are running against Trump, the personal attacks start and they become an object of constant public ridicule. Just ask Ron DeSantis.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The very act of campaigning effects poll numbers. Figures like Newsom are pretty obscure outside their states.

            Also there’s quite a difference between running against Trump as a Republican and a Democrat. DeSantis had to contend with his own Party being divided. A hypothetical Biden replacement would have the Party’s unified support.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The very act of campaigning tends to drag candidates down as their flaws are identified and hammered over and over.

              That’s what happened to Dukakis, Gore, McCain, Clinton, etc. Even Obama, who in 2008 went from “inspirational DNC orator” to “inexperienced community activist”.

              And that’s what’s happening to Biden.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Biden’s polls have been fairly static or even slightly improved over time.

          The other Democrats have done nothing to win over new voters, so there is no reason to think they would poll better against Trump today.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Good thing he didn’t call them. They wouldn’t have understood his mumbling.