It impacts the future of the election interference case.
    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      24·
      4 months ago

      I’m clairvoyant and I can see the future: They won’t. It’s always been all bark and no bite when it comes to armed revolution here in the states.

    • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
      297·
      4 months ago

      2A has been toothless for awhile. What good is stock modded AR15 supposed to do against tanks and fighters jets.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        273·
        4 months ago

        To be fair, the fighting would be guerilla warfare which the us hasn’t been that great at dealing with.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        131·
        4 months ago

        It’s still good enough to shoot people who accidentally step on your lawn, or the teachers and co-students you had a disagreement with.

      • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
        3·
        4 months ago

        We could probably mount a pretty decent resistance with what we have available. look what happened in iraq during the occupation. insurgency would be the way to go in a rebellion against the us govt.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        221·
        4 months ago

        And that’s why they didn’t bother with guns in Iraq. Defeating the Americans was hopeless; mission accomplished.

        • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
          132·
          4 months ago

          This response is so weird I can’t quite tell what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Iraqis resisted with small arms fire? Because that’s not the case.

          More US citizens die each year in the US from guns than US soldiers died in the entirety of the Iraq war. And it’s not a small difference either - each year 4-5x as many citizens die from gun violence. Not including suicides (which would more than double the number)

          So was your post trying to say the small arms resistance in Iraq was effective?