The Supreme Court must be impartial regardless of legislative and executive political mudslinging of the time. That’s the whole point of different branches of government.
If SCOTUS made the decision after seeing Trump and Biden debate, or knowing Republicans will control both houses, then they aren’t doing their job as they should. There’s a reason why juries are encouraged not to watch TV or media that would cloud their decision, and the same should apply to judges.
People forget the bloody whole point of checks and balance!
I’d be okay with a violent one. Drag the justices out and tar and feather them. They want to make this country great again? Fine. Let’s show them what made it great: vigilante justice against tyranny.
They didn’t forget: they explictly and knowingly realized they could abuse the checks and balances and there would be no consequences. And they have so far been right.
The Supreme Court must be impartial regardless of legislative and executive political mudslinging of the time.
then they aren’t doing their job as they should.
There were times in my life when I was pretty much a functioning alcoholic. If you think that the supreme court has even a shred of decency left, then I want to drink what you are drinking. I don’t think I ever got that drunk it my life.
The Supreme Court must be impartial regardless of legislative and executive political mudslinging of the time. That’s the whole point of different branches of government.
If SCOTUS made the decision after seeing Trump and Biden debate, or knowing Republicans will control both houses, then they aren’t doing their job as they should. There’s a reason why juries are encouraged not to watch TV or media that would cloud their decision, and the same should apply to judges.
People forget the bloody whole point of checks and balance!
Yeah sure, except that they clearly aren’t. So the question is what do we do now?
Cool story. Now figure out how to stop them other than ‘vote’. Cause we know that’s just kicking the can down the road.
Is non violent insurrection on the table?
I’d be okay with a violent one. Drag the justices out and tar and feather them. They want to make this country great again? Fine. Let’s show them what made it great: vigilante justice against tyranny.
Every non violent success story has someone behind the non violent one ready to burn shit down that makes the non violent one the easier choice.
Gandhi?
They didn’t forget: they explictly and knowingly realized they could abuse the checks and balances and there would be no consequences. And they have so far been right.
There were times in my life when I was pretty much a functioning alcoholic. If you think that the supreme court has even a shred of decency left, then I want to drink what you are drinking. I don’t think I ever got that drunk it my life.