• John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    102
    ·
    2 months ago

    No they’re not. They can’t even finish a single solution, let alone actually make anything functional when you’re not using their proprietary servers. They’re becoming Microsoft.

    • micka190@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      They can’t finish a single solution

      Gee, it’s almost as if that’s the whole point of an ever-evolving SaaS platform.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        A SaaS solution that claims to be private but won’t provide the backend code to prove it. You don’t find it at all suspicious that they claim releasing backend code would make it less secure? What kind of security product is not open for inspection? The same kind of “security” you get from Microsoft.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I imagine it probably is inspected, just not by the public. They probably do it themselves.

          And they may have contracts with certain companies specializing in this sort of security that also inspect it.

          And there’s also the cybersecurity companies that test it whether they’re contracted or not. At some companies, their entire job revolves around finding bugs (especially security bugs) in other companies’ software.

          Just because it’s not on GitHub doesn’t mean it’s not a good product that hasn’t been thoroughly tested.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            You realize that Microsoft code is inspected as well, even more heavily and regulated… and yet they still end up with major breaches. Security evolves through open source collaboration and inspection by experts that aren’t being paid to say you’re doing a good job.

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          You don’t find it at all suspicious that they claim releasing backend code would make it less secure? What kind of security product is not open for inspection?

          No, because Proton has 3rd party audits all the time and they share the results openly.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Microsoft has third party audits all the time and say they’re secure, and then you learn of new backdoors every 6 months. Audit companies are unreliable and paid to give good feedback while doing the least work possible.

        • deezbutts@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah because enterprises primarily use a ton of open source security tools…

          ಠ_ಠ

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Enterprises are using a plethora of open source tools at this point. They may still utilize closed source solutions, but they definitely have quite a bit of open source solutions tied in.

      • slooopy_potatoe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        Releasing unfinished products and expect users to just make do while they launch the next product can’t be the solution either.

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then it’s a good thing all of their products are fully functional and working as advertised, I guess.

            • naught101@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              2 months ago

              Which bits are not functional? I’m using their email and calendar… they aren’t completely polished, but they’re very usable.

              • slooopy_potatoe@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Drive has no Linux client, Photos is extremely barebones and locks you basically in, as there is no export function.

                Pass still has no proper SimpleLogin integration, no credit card support and UX wise is the browser extension pretty bad. Funny enough, years after launch you still can’t auto fill on Reddit.

                The only thing I don’t like about Mail is that you still have to create reverse aliases through SimpleLogin. Better integration would be great.

                Contacts still don’t sync to you local mobile contacts. Which means you either do it manually or you have to keep two sets updated.

                Calendar is good too, I’ve heard it has no offline support though. Although I haven’t verified that.

                Last thing I would like to see is notification support without Play Services.

                Some of those things might be super unimportant to some, but for me it makes the use of their stuff unnecessary cumbersome. Especially if you consider that those are all Proton products and should work together well.

                My by far biggest problem is their communication and general development speed though. Stuff like contact sync has been requested for 5(?) years now but there hasn’t been so much as a “we’re working on it”.

                It feels to me they come out with new products all the time, like the document editor now, without addressing the little things that would make their ecosystem great.

                Anyway, long ramble. But I appreciate that you asked for more details without insulting me.

                • nieminen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Drive has no Linux client,

                  I’m actually pretty sure they have one. I was doing a lot of exploring the last 2 days to make sure it was worth it to me to spend money on. And I landed on a downloads page on my Linux desktop that had a download link for drive for fedora, or debian. I can’t find it on mobile (where I am now), but I’ll look later on my PC and see if I can link it.

                  Was wrong, not sure what I found. Must have been the vpn or mail app.

                  Photos is extremely barebones and locks you basically in, as there is no export function

                  Interesting, thanks for the heads up. Hopefully it gets better later on, but for the moment I’m glad I made my own solution using a NAS, and a sync client.

                  Contacts still don’t sync

                  This was one of my first concerns, I’m also annoyed by it.

                  Additionally, I was hoping their big “docs update” would also include spreadsheets, but hopefully soon.

                • naught101@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s a good list. Certainly a public feature/bug tracker would be nice. But those are pretty rare for corporate software…

    • Jin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      All Their services are online based right? I don’t understand why using their proprietary servers is an argument here.

      • claudiop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, if you want to have any sense of a service respecting you, it should be hosted on a server you can control?

        No difference at all between the server of the world’s biggest advertiser and a server by a company that opens itself for audits and is in a country whole laws require no bullshit? Are you sure those two are the same? All or nothing?

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because their primary audience is those gullible enough to believe they somehow can’t read your messages, yet they can easily capture your private password.