I mean, it kinda sounds similar… what’s the last innovative product from Apple?

Sure, at first, they’re just slamming their laptops shut to write morse code… but how long until it’s a cell door that they’re slamming? It’s a slippery slope.

By all reports, his father bought the gun. While I agree with them, your suggestions would have done literally nothing in this situation.

The Trump campaign already disavowed it, even if we all know that’s a lie. It’s trivial for them to handwave it away

Edit: I have no idea why this is getting downvotes.

Because you made it clear in this comment that the headline is biased by using incomplete terms and trying to hide what the actual spending was.

Remember that nobody uses votes as intended, and nobody will ever manage to change that.

Social and economic funding went down? It’s almost as if the GOP obstructs all progress when a Dem administration is in power… anyone remember that infrastructure bill? Or student loan forgiveness? Or funding for abortion access?

If you support genocide, then you don’t deserve the protection anyway. Nobody is calling for Israeli genocide, they’re calling for the end of another Holocaust.

How do they receive feedback about their evolutionary experiments? How do they know it worked/failed.

They’re not performing experiments, mutations are random and they either help the plant survive/reproduce, make it harder to do so, or have no appreciable effect. If it helps the plant, more of them will survive and reproduce, meaning more of the plant with that mutation will be more common. If it hurts, then it will be less common.

But she’ll have the honor of being part of the subjugated gender!

…are you under the impression that high-end running shoes are a scam, or something?

A good sneaker will virtually always be way more comfortable than a good running shoe. To risk going with an extreme analogy, it’s like trying to hammer a nail with a sledgehammer - it will get the job done, sure, but it’s absolutely not made for that.

I’m sorry, but this started like a recipe article and I lost all interest. I don’t care about your life story, I clicked the link to read your opinions, and you spent the first several paragraphs avoiding them.

Interesting, I’m actually the exact opposite. I always start with Google, because it’s usually good enough, but whenever it takes 2-3 tries to get something relevant, I switch to ddg and get it first try.

If the only two challengers only got 3% each, then I’m sorry, but there are no challengers.

Our voting system is undemocratic. Until that isn’t the case, I will keep trying to push people away from wasting their votes.