I guarantee that he will say that the attack wouldn’t have happened if more of his followers had ar 15s there

Step 1. Fascist attempt to overthrow government campaigning on eradicating LGBT

Step 2. “Hey that’s not good”

Step 3. “Hey stop pushing an agenda”

Bruh of course there’s an agenda. It’s called “wanting to not be eradicated”

I’m sorry that wanting what’s best for the world offends you. Maybe you should consider moving to Israel, I hear they don’t push agendas there.

Edit: unless you’re talking about op, in which case sorry.

You got so close and yet missed the point. The “swamp” that he hired wants to genocide LGBT people. His regime was responsible for millions of American deaths the last go around. If he gets into office again, that’s going to set fixing the climate back a decade, and by then it will be too late if it isn’t already. We saw how he failed to handle his presidential duties at every level last term, and we can’t risk letting that happen again but this time with the powers of a king. The guy literally said he was going to be a dictator and the SCOTUS made that legal.

To be clear, none of this is to convince you. You are almost undoubtedly a Russian troll or right winger, and I have no desire to engage with you whatsoever. If you ceased to exist I wouldn’t lose a wink of sleep. “Centrists” and “undecideds” don’t exist in America anymore. If you are even considering trump after everything he’s done, you deserve to have your voting rights taken away if not worse.

This next election is the final election that will actually decide the future of America for the next decade or so. Everyone now has a side, and if we can’t get the voter turnout to decide what’s right, then the dice have been rolled and our fate is sealed. So this comment is directed towards those that actually have a functioning brain, but are worried that their vote might not be enough to turn the tides. It doesn’t matter, you should still vote, because this very well might be the last election you get to vote in.

Not saying that I agree or disagree, but why does the parents consent matter?

To be clear, I’m not arguing that is is evidence, i merely arguing that it could be a result of how they chose to render our simulation. And just because it’s more computationally expensive on our side does not necessarily mean it’s more expensive on their side, because we don’t know what the mechanics of the deeper layer may have been.

For example, it would be a lot less computationally expensive to render accuracy in a simulation for us down to cellular level than it would be down to atomic scale. From there, we could simply replicate the rules of how molecules work without actually rendering them, such as “cells seem to have a finite amount of energy based on food you consume, and we can model the mathematics of how that works, but we can’t seem to find a physical structure that allows that to function”

Quantum is weird. If we are in a simulation, that would explain a lot of that, because the quantum effects we see are actually just light simulations of much deeper mechanics.

As such, if we were simulating a universe, there’s every chance that we may decide to only simulate down to individual atoms. So the people in the simulation would probably discover atoms, but then they would have to come up with their own version of quantum mechanics to describe the effects that we know come from quarks.

The point is that each layer may choose to simulate things slightly lighter to save on resources, and you would have no way of knowing.

Oishi neko

Bruh if conservatives just stop being a threat to democracy we will start talking about them, ez

Where )

I got that, but wtf does would if notes box mean

Is the current president and former vice president capable of being president… tough question.

Think of the poor corporation! If they get punished for their illegal buisness practices, it’ll hurt the economy and people will be less inclined to start a small buisness. Didn’t you study piss down economics?