No it wouldn’t have been WW3. If Iran does it it’s payback for Soleimani and everyone knows it.

And the Aileen Cannons underneath them.

Should.

They’ll be making stuff for rich people.

So a patriot?

My guess is only 95% are true. Clearly Donny is the one being victimized here, so he should be made president in compensation.

Republicans think it’s bad for AGs to shield presidents now?

That’s silly. Trump has lots of “Locked In” support, but not enough to win.

Same reason my darling’s tik tok feed suddenly featured humanizing Trump videos the moment he reversed direction on the Tik Tok ban, even though she hates both Trump and politics and would never willingly look at a video of either.

She’s savvy, but she’s one of the least cynical of the bunch.

The left has to hold together with the center-right, let’s face it.

Yeah really, if you like Harris, just vote for Biden and wait a couple of months.

How does this work? The delegates vote until they agree on someone?

They’ve created an Emperor with themselves as Popes.

Imagine being a big deal in the Catholic Church and complaining about the Deep State.

They’re even willing to support the antichrist if that moves things along.

The founders did anticipate direct democracy, the two-party system, and demagoguery. These were much discussed. They weren’t able to provide perfectly for these eventualities, which also was well understood at the time.

The constitution clearly doesn’t allow a president to be removed from office by a prosecution, but it just as clearly doesn’t offer any immunity to a prosecution for presidents and not to mention ex-presidents. There’s never been a presidency, including Donny’s, where a criminal charge was even contemplated that would have impinged on a president’s legitimate duties.

That’d be fine, but simplest move for Biden is to install Hunter as Veep, then have Hunter declare Joe the winner of the election next January. When Joe kicks the bucket a few months later, the presidency gets handed down from father to son as God intended.

It’s easy to fix. Joe appoints pro-constitution justices, they in turn prosecute him for murder.

“The trial court is free to determine that lying to the VP for purposes of committing election fraud does not constitute an official act.”

Based on what standard? How could a trial court reach such a decision in a way that won’t be overturned?

The Supremos have sent this back to the courts with the message that there’s only one way to decide and no plausible way to reach another conclusion that will hold up.