That shacking up with random people can/should be perfectly safe.
That shacking up with random people can/should be perfectly safe.
Because idiots salivate any time something novel promises to confirm their biases.
Is it too much to ask
Are you willing to deliver them consequences if they don’t do it the way you want?
The whole environment needs to be as clean as humans are capable of making it, utilizing the most advanced technology available, so every nanometer of the machine is in immaculate condition.
Because you keep making salacious claims that can’t be properly sourced instead of focusing on provable arguments.
If it works well for the job
Your example is one where it clearly isn’t a great fit for the job. If you wanted to transfer sensitive data discretely, a floppy could be significantly better than a wired network where you’ve got to worry about America/Russia/China/Israel/Iran and who knows who else peeping on the transfer, or a USB drive which is already known to be compromised by stuxnet derivatives.
If it works well for the job that it’s tasked to perform, why change it? It’s got the added benefit of being an unintentional security feature now too, as very few others will even have a drive for reading them. Sort of like how manual transmissions are much less likely to be stolen now.
Bring back support for Windows 7 and Windows 10 will die overnight.
Nobody said a bias can’t be stupid.