It is hard to imagine that there was not someone inside of Nike that lost their faith in humanity when the pitch for these things was originally taking off.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    3 months ago

    Losing the app means that people can’t change the color of the light on the shoe. You can still do all the other shit manually.

    That said, I feel like companies should be required to open source shit like this once they drop support for it. Otherwise stuff like this adds to the mountains of e-waste poisoning the planet.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 months ago

    Companies really should just opensource their apps at this point, or at the very least publish their protocols.

    Can’t see how dropping apps and bricking devices benefits anyone.

    • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      A point could be made that it hurts the planet and they should be held responsible for their shenanigans.

      As with that spotify car thing.

    • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Agreed. Companies should be required by law to release source code, build guides, documentation and service architecture for services or apps that are required by hardware they sold.

      While there are bigger fish to fry at the moment, socially speaking, the problem is only going to get worse if legislators don’t step in.

    • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Source code escrow is a thing, too. I’ve only seen it in the context of (as I understood it) protection against going out of business, but perhaps it could apply to discontinued products, as well?

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    Isn’t the point of self-lacing shoes that they shouldn’t require manual user input at all? What is the app for then?

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    So will there be a pirate app floating around for those who own these? Are there enough peeps who bought these for there to be interest in making one? Can’t be tough

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    Finally, they fixed shoe-tying. Now all I gotta do when I wanna tie my shoes is download an app and make sure my shoes are charged.

  • Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need self tightening AI nuts and bolts. We could sell them to Boeing or something idk.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh yeah. Let’s hand aviation safety to the technology that thinks deathcap mushrooms are delicious and healthy.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I dont know what you’re on about.

        My Glue special pizza is delicious, and solved my issues with loose bowel movements! I dont even have bowel movements at all anymore! Its great!

  • jdeath@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    what happens if you are wearing these when the app gets shut off? 0.o

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Are hyper-expensive running shoes STILL a thing? Damn, people need to grow up.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Damn, people need to grow up.

      They just move onto hyper-expensive cars, watches, Warhammer figurines, purses, jewelry, etc. The human instinct to flaunt and/or collect is pretty strong in certain people.

    • eyeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      If anything the gap is bigger than ever as the top end shoes are basically performance enhancers like the nike airflys used to set most records…and their new vaporflys being banned in the Olympics.

      I guess it’s better than hyper expensive shoes just being a paying for a brand thing?

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I thought the shoe market had nothing to do with actual usefulness, just how rare they are. It’s not like most of the people buying these expensive shoes actually wear them.

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I wasn’t aware there was a difference. What classifies a shoe as a runner vs a sneaker? It seems like there’s a ton of overlap to me

            • Cheesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Running shoes will focus on function with support, breathability, moisture wicking, and breathability. They aren’t necessarily the most comfy shoes to walk in because your gait is different walking vs running. The front of the shoe will have more cushion to help support you pushing off in your running stride.

              Sneakers are meant to be more stylish everyday shoe. They focus more on form over function.

              You’re right there can be overlap. Adidas ultra boosts are stylish enough to be worn every day and are technically a running shoe. Not a lot of runners use them but they do offer the function of a running shoe.

              • xthexder@l.sw0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Interesting to know. I’ve been buying running shoes and wearing them everyday. I don’t even run or jog really. I guess I could be buying sneakers and they might end up more comfortable? At the rate I wear through shoes though, my current ones will probably last another 5 years.

                • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  A good sneaker will virtually always be way more comfortable than a good running shoe. To risk going with an extreme analogy, it’s like trying to hammer a nail with a sledgehammer - it will get the job done, sure, but it’s absolutely not made for that.

      • roguetrick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        In the end you can start making a shoe that almost functions like a prosthetic. We are not animals designed to always be running, but with a few tweaks you can make that closer to be true.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That is so very not the problem here. Everyone has things they enjoy that other people think are frivolous.

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      …are you under the impression that high-end running shoes are a scam, or something?

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    “I’ve got to leave early.”
    “Why? We’re having fun!”
    “Sorry, I got to go home and charge my shoes.”

    We surely live in the future! /s