a good start, but
a good start, but
“Should we vote for him to keep going? Nah, let’s just undo every bit of progress because life is not perfect yet” - leftists
Fuck that cutting off your nose to spite your face bullshit.
Biden has made more progress on all of these issues than any other president in my adult lifetime. PROGRESS. Not “instantly made everything perfect” .
Biden has us moving in the right direction. More of that please.
It’s short enough time that a new nominee would literally be disqualified from the ballot in some states.
Jon Stewart podcast it was brought up that white male establishment guys like Joe probably arent capable of just handing power to a black woman.
He was vp to a Black President, what kind of idiocy is this?
CNN recently got bought by MAGA garbage and is skewing right wing.
People don’t care about policies.
Sounds like you’re the miserable one lol
Have fun driving to the nearest restaurant, which is an Applebee’s
Oh no, such a shithole, no one likes it here that’s why prices are through the damn roof lol
Cities are expensive because the country sucks balls so anyone with two braincells to rub together moves to the city.
Improve your life by moving to a shithole rural area where houses are cheap?
Jesus you people are insufferable. Not knowing about Whitmer is a single anecdote that is consistent with a trend that is quite obvious and so help me god if you do that sealioning bullshit demanding a peer reviewed study about Whitmers name recognition
If you only look at each individual tree as a tree, you’ll fail to realize you’re in a forest.
and their opinions are not reflective or representative of anything
Are you serious? The vast majority of the voting age citizenry are ignoramuses.
I lived alone for a year in 2017 and I did not like it. I was in a 3 bedroom house in a small city and it was just too much house and too empty. I’d always lived with someone (family/roommates/girlfriend) before.
Now, I think I’d be better with it, especially in a smaller place.
It’s not a market failure, it’s a deliberate constraint on supply by local governments, in most cases. It’s local government interfering with the market.
Developers would LOVE to build more housing. Not that I’m any fan of developers, but they’re not the cause of the supply shortage here.
If you’re able to pay for rent, you’re able to afford paying back a loan.
May not be true depending on where OP lives. There are a lot of rent vs buy calculators out there, and home prices are so expensive in some areas that it’s actually better financially to rent instead of own, and to invest the difference in payments. For example that’s the case where I live in San Francisco - investing the difference between rent payments and mortgage payments nets me more in the long run, even considering housing value appreciation.
Edit: this of course doesn’t apply to investment properties, where you get the value of the asset + appreciation, but also get rental payments.
It greatly depends on what your criteria is for “better”.
For example, historically I’ve put up with a lot in order to save on rent costs. I still am (cheap place with roommates), but I’m getting a little tired of it. I’m actively searching for a good deal on a solo apartment so I don’t have to live with other people anymore, but by the same token I’m not willing to do it unless it’s only a moderate increase in my current rental payment.
I don’t understand how anyone who understands election law can seriously be suggesting a replacement.
For example, a new Democratic candidate wouldn’t be eligible to be on the ballot in Ohio. It would be just handing a state to Trump.
No.