• kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Bernie had this right. Despite being pretty progressive, he wasn’t for outlawing semiautomatic firearms because they were black and looked scary. He believed that the right to arms was justified. This “AR Ban” is a great way to lose a lot of independents, and even some hard D voters like myself. There are a lot of dems who carry, and a lot of them who own the very firearms he wants to ban.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      I had a friend that said he only voted for Trump in 2016 cause he felt like he needed somebody to protect his rights to own a gun. This guy that “protected” host rights to own a fun also did massive amounts of damage to other people rights.

      I wish Dems would quit talking about guns. It’s a mistake.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      The next would be assasin will be forced to use a weapon appropriate for distance killing. They would be more likely to succeed.

      • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The failed Trump shooter used a rifle completely appropriate for the distance. He was just a “comically bad” shooter, according to acquaintances.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      As an independent, I could care less about this sort of thing. I see it as virtue signaling to staunch democrats. It won’t win him a single vote, since his entire platform has always been about being a super traditional Democrat.

      We need new traditions, not rehashing of old, tired trades against things like specific types of guns and obesity.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Actually that is a good question. You don’t need an AR-15 because there are non-AR semi-automatic rifles that will do exactly the same thing but aren’t viewed as bad-ass. (BTW, auto-loading rifles have been around since 1883.) The AR-15 is a civilian semi-automatic and the basis of the M-16, so larpers can fulfill their G.I. Joe fantasies and a cuddle them when they are told to fear something by Fox.

      • Jackfinished@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Need? I don’t but I wanted one so here we are. AR ban is stupid will only help conservatives in the election. I’m not against gun control legislation that will actually do good.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Have you ever fired one before? They are way more accurate than a handgun. You could be 5ft away from someone with a handgun and still miss (especially in a high adrenaline situation). It’s considerably more difficult to miss with an AR.

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      He’s not gonna do shit, he’s just gonna continue to bark at one of the symptoms of the problem.